Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Alex S. Garcia's avatar

Maybe you should send her a link to this article ;)

Expand full comment
Matt Barker's avatar

This is a great piece brother.

There is a cynical and non-cynical way to approach impermanent relationships. It sounds like you have embraced the non-cynical approach and gotten hurt in the process, but that’s how it goes. It’s better to feel hurt than to try to force yourself to feel nothing.

The cynical approach (which I associate with Anglo-American capitalist striving) tries to maximize body count in order to “win” at sex. The non-cynical approach (which I would associate with stereotypes of places like France or Italy) recognizes that even temporary relationships must be experienced fully. The cynical approach tries to strip emotional connection from sex and de-emphasize the importance of one’s partner. In a cynical hookup culture sexual partners become interchangeable commodities. The non-cynical approach embraces the emotional messiness of romance. The idea of amour fou, an emotional experience that burns so hot and so fast that it necessarily extinguishes itself, is anathema to modern American dating. Even if one is “looking for something serious”, and thus “taking it slow”, they’re putting up the same emotional barriers to keep themselves from being hurt that someone only looking for hookups would.

Dating is necessarily messy. You’re supposed to get hurt. And you’re supposed to leave ephemeral relationships behind eventually once you find something deep and sustainable. But that’s all up to chance.

Expand full comment
14 more comments...

No posts